Union claimed that district committed unfair labor practice by refusing to pay certain health
insurance benefits in violation of collective bargaining agreement.  PELRB dismissed union's
charges and ordered parties to return to negotiations finding that subject contract
provisions were ambiguous and that there was never mutual understanding between parties
as to scope of health insurance coverage.

Disclaimer: This summary is intended to provide a brief description of the issues in this case
and the outcome.  The summary is not a substitute for the decision, should not be relied upon
in place of the decision, and should not be cited as controlling or relevant authority in PELRB
proceedings or other proceedings.