|
Union claimed
that town committed unfair labor practice by failing to
uniformly apply results
of arbitration award relative to loss of disability
retirement benefits by one employee. PELRB
dismissed union's complaint finding that it lacked
jurisdiction to consider whether award had
precedential effect as arbitrator's final and binding award
made no clear statement of
precedential effect.
Disclaimer: This summary is intended to provide a
brief description of the issues in this case
and the outcome. The summary is not a substitute for
the decision, should not be relied upon
in place of the decision, and should not be cited as
controlling or relevant authority in PELRB
proceedings or other proceedings. |