|
PRE-HEARING MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
Date of Conference:
January 7, 2009
Appearances:
Complainant: John S. Krupski, Esq.
Respondent:
Thomas J. Flygare, Esq.
Background:
Exeter
Professional Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 3491 (“Union”) filed an
unfair labor practice complaint on November 26, 2008 based upon the Town’s
assignment of a member of the Exeter Call Company to a regular bargaining
unit shift. The Union contends the Town has breached the provisions of
Section 16.5 of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement on account of
the Town’s assignment of non-bargaining unit personnel to perform the duties
of bargaining unit employees. The Union asserts that while the staffing
decisions in dispute may not be subject to the grievance procedure per
Section 16.5 (“[n]one of the provisions of Section 16.5, Minimum Manning,
shall be grievable under Section 18, Grievance Procedure”), the final step
of which is advisory arbitration, the Union still has the right to challenge
the Town’s action by filing a claim with the PELRB under RSA 273-A:5, I (h)(to
breach a collective bargaining agreement).
As relief, the Union requests that the PELRB find: 1) that the Town violated
RSA 273-A:5, I (h); 2) order the Town to cease and desist from further
breach of Section 16.5; 3) make whole any member of the bargaining unit who
was denied overtime compensation who should have been assigned to the
shift’s fifth member position and was displaced by the non-unit employee;
and 4) grant such other and further relief as may be just.
The Town filed its answer on December 11, 2008 and a motion to dismiss based
upon the Union’s failure to file a grievance. At the pre-hearing, the Town
conceded that in a grievance proceeding the Town would likely argue that the
Union was not entitled to grieve the matter. The Town generally contends
that its staffing decisions were proper and are not subject to review
through the grievance procedure or via an unfair labor practice charge.
The Town requests that the PELRB: 1) dismiss the complaint with prejudice;
2) order the Union to reimburse the Town for its expenses and fees in
connection with this matter; and 3) order such other relief as may be just.
ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION BY THE BOARD
1.. Whether
the Union is obligated to complete the grievance process before proceeding
with its statutory claim?
2. The extent to which the Town’s staffing decisions are subject to review
in a statutory unfair labor practice proceeding given the language contained
in Section 16.5 of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement, and if such
decisions are subject to review, whether the Town has violated Section 16.5?
WITNESSES
For the Union:
1.Daniel Bilodeau
2. Jason Greene
3. Richard E. Molan
For the Town:
1. Brian Comeau
2. Russell Dean
Both parties reserve the right to amend their List of Witnesses in
conformity with the schedule contained in the DECISION SECTION appearing at
the conclusion of this order or, upon proper showing, later with reasonable
notice to the other party. It is understood that each party may rely on the
representations of the other party that witnesses appearing on their
respective list will be available at the hearing.
EXHIBITS
For the Union:
1. Collective Bargaining Agreement
For the Town:
1. Collective Bargaining Agreement
Both parties reserve the right to amend their List of Exhibits in conformity
with the schedule contained in the DECISION SECTION appearing at the
conclusion of this order or, upon proper showing, later with reasonable
notice to the other party. Copies of all exhibits are to be submitted to the
presiding officer in accordance with Pub 203.02. It is understood that each
party may rely on the representations of the other party that the exhibits
listed above will be available at the hearing.
DECISION
1. “Parties”
means the named petitioner and respondent or the counsel/representative
appearing in the case.
2. As discussed at the pre-hearing, the Town shall notify the PELRB whether
it will waive its argument that the Union must first exhaust the grievance
process given the Town’s likely defense that the dispute is not subject to
any review and the fact that the parties’ collective bargaining agreement
provides for advisory arbitration. The deadline for this notification is on
or before January 14, 2009.
3. The parties shall prepare and file a statement of stipulated facts on or
before January 23, 2009. Based upon the discussions at the
pre-hearing, it appears that the parties can prepare a fairly comprehensive
fact stipulation. Objections to the admissibility of any particular fact
stipulation is not a basis for refusing to stipulate to an otherwise
uncontested fact, although it is expected that the parties will not seek
fact stipulations as to matters which are plainly irrelevant. The written
fact stipulation shall include a statement of a party’s relevancy objection
immediately following the stipulated fact. The board will address any such
relevancy objection to a stipulated fact to the extent necessary in
connection with its decision.
4. The parties shall file any amendments to, or deletions from, their
Witness and Exhibit lists on or before January 23, 2009.
5. The parties shall pre-mark all exhibits for identification or as full
exhibits by agreement prior to the time of hearing and have sufficient
copies available for distribution at the hearing as required by Pub 203.02.
HEARING
Unless
otherwise ordered as a result of the filing of any subsequent motion or for
other good cause shown, the evidentiary hearing between the parties will be
held on January 26, 2009 @ 9:00 a.m. at the offices of the Public
Employee Labor Relations Board in Concord. The time set aside for this
hearing is 4 hours. If either party believes that additional time is
required, written notice of the need for additional time shall be filed with
the PELRB at least 10 days prior to the date of hearing.
So ordered.
January 12, 2009
/s/ Douglas L. Ingersoll
Staff Counsel/Hearing Officer
Distribution:
John S. Krupski, Esq.
Thomas J. Flygare, Esq.
|