|
|
| SEARCH THIS SITE |
|
|
| State
Employees Association of New Hampshire Local 1984 SEIU Petitioner v. State of New Hampshire Respondent |
Decision
No. 2002-011 Case No. S-0315-2 |
|
PRE-HEARING DECISION and ORDER BACKGROUND The State Employees Association
of New Hampshire, Local 1984, SEIU, (hereinafter referred to as the "Union") filed a Modification Petition on December
10, 2001 by which it sought to exclude seven positions from
the existing bargaining unit which had previously been
certified through a "grandfathering" process. The
basis for the claimed exclusions was that the employees
holding these positions performed duties that would
characterize them as confidential employees pursuant to RSA
273-A:I(c). The State of New Hampshire responded by filing
its exceptions to the Union's petition on December 26, 2001
in
which it denied that all employee positions listed by the
Union were confidential and therefore should not be excluded
through modification proceedings. It did indicate that three
of the listed positions were confidential employees.
Thereafter, the matter was scheduled for a Pre-Hearing
Conference that was conducted on January 18, 2001. PARTICIPATING REPRESENTATIVES For the Petitioner: Dennis Martino, Executive Assistant SEIU, SEA-NH For the
Respondent: Thomas
F. Manning, Director, Division of Personnel 1. The parties agree that three of the seven employees are confidential employees and thereby shall, following the evidentiary hearing, be excluded from the existing unit. ISSUE FOR DETERMINATION AT HEARING 1. Whether or not the
remaining employee positions, listed in the Union's Modification Petition,
are to
be excluded from the existing bargaining as "confidential" employees
pursuant to RSA 372-A:1(c)? WITNESSES For the Petitioner: 1. Pamela
Blake, SEA Bargaining Team Member 1. John
Ratoff, Commisssioner of Employment Security EXHIBITS For the Petitioner: 1. General
Job Descriptions For the Respondent: 1. None
identified LENGTH OF HEARING The time being set aside for a hearing of this matter is one half day. If either party believes additional time is required, written notice of the need for additional time shall be filed with the PELRB no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order. DECISION AND PRE-HEARING ORDER 1. The party representatives shall meet, or otherwise arrange, to pre-mark exhibits for identification purposes and exchange copies of their respective proposed exhibits, excepting those singularly required for impeachment purposes, prior to the evidentiary hearing. Such exhibits shall be produced in sufficient number at the hearing as required by Pub 203.02. 2. Any preliminary, procedural or dispositive motions shall be filed by the parties no later than ten (10) days prior to the scheduled hearing date. Unless otherwise ordered as a result of the
filing of any subsequent motion, an evidentiary hearing
between the parties is scheduled to be conducted at the Office
of the Public Employee Labor Relations Board on March 1, 2002
beginning at 9:00 AM. /s/ Donald E. Mitchell, Esq. |
![]() |
![]() | |||||
|
|
|
|